Amid probe, agency to cut school costs

Construction chief trims tasks
Thursday, February 24, 2005 • BY DUNSTAN McNICHOL • Star-Ledger Staff

Facing an inspector general's review of cost overruns and potential conflicts of interest, officials in charge of New Jersey's $8.6 billion school construction program yesterday announced plans to reduce project oversight costs and eliminate a $2 million advertising campaign.

In addition, Schools Construction Corp. Chairman Jack Kocsis said he would no longer serve as head of the corporation's audit committee and would remove himself from any role in the inspector general's review.

The changes, announced by Kocsis and CEO Jack Spencer at the regular monthly meeting of the corporation, came after a recent Star-Ledger report that found the six schools erected by the SCC since 2002 have cost, on average, 46 percent more than 19 schools built by local districts at the same time.

The report showed the SCC has accepted $526 million in change orders, is paying its architects and construction managers more than double the standard rate, and has awarded $1 billion in work to firms that are members of the Building Contractors Association of New Jersey, where Kocsis serves as executive director, lobbyist and political fund-raiser.

In a prepared statement he read at yesterday's board meeting, Kocsis defended the SCC.

"To say we are dispirited by the sketchy allegations outlined in one newspaper, and how the insinuations are attacking the credibility of the board, and myself, is an understatement," he said. "There is no doubt that the board members and the hard-working employees of the NJSCC will emerge vindicated, both as individuals, and as an organization, in our mission and our decisions."

Kocsis said he would not step down as chairman but announced he would no longer head the corporation's audit committee, saying it "needs to be a vital and reliable conduit to the authorities who will need to assess our performance and evaluate our decisions to see if proper procedures and protocols were followed."

He said he would not play any role in the Inspector General Mary Jane Cooper's review, but he would set up a special committee to work with her.

At yesterday's meeting, the board adopted a 2005 operating budget of $34.6 million -- a reduction of $5 million from the budget adopted for 2004.

The new budget includes only $200,000 for advertising -- down from $2 million included in last year's spending plan.

"Our intent here is to rely on local school districts," said Spencer. "We'll rely on their Web sites and on them stuffing things into kids' knapsacks."

Lawmakers last year criticized the corporation for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on glossy newsletters that featured numerous pictures and references to then-Gov. James E. McGreevey.

"It's clear Governor Codey is not using the SCC as a political slush fund, both to his credit and the SCC's credit," said Assemblyman Bill Baroni (R-Mercer), who criticized the mailers last year. "I'm glad the SCC is focusing on schools and not on politics."

Kevin McElroy, a spokesman for the SCC, said that of the $2 million budgeted for advertising last year, the corporation spent $500,000.

Spencer said the corporation also has decided to scale back the role of the agency's hired Project Management Firms. The firms, which include 13 of the region's largest contracting companies, have been paid more than $216 million to help coordinate the schools construction program and monitor construction work.

Spencer said that from now on, the Project Management Firms will work only on the preliminary stages of a construction project, helping local school boards choose sites for new schools, evaluate architects and solicit bids. Once the construction begins, Spencer said, the SCC will replace the Project Management Firms with construction managers to oversee the actual work and manage change orders and other scheduling matters.

Until now, the SCC has paid its Project Management Firms fees equal to 9.5 percent of the value of the work they have overseen. Local school boards, meanwhile, paid their construction managers fees that generally were less than 3 percent.

"We have made the decision to move forward where we will make more construction management services available, and concentrate the Project Management Firms' tasks on the upfront work," said Spencer.

Spencer said the SCC, which has spent just over $3 billion in its first two years of existence, is on track to spend $2 billion more in 2005. By early next year, he said, the corporation will have earmarked the entire $8.6 billion lawmakers authorized it to spend. He has asked lawmakers for an additional $2 billion to continue designing and building new schools through 2006.

Assemblyman Joseph Malone (R-Burlington), a sponsor of the original legislation that set up the corporation, said he wants a statewide referendum on any new school construction financing.

"It's gotten to the point where the whole thing is a runaway train," said Malone. "And someone has to put the brakes on."


Dunstan McNichol covers state government issues. He may be reached at dmcnichol@starledger.com or (609) 989-0341.
© 2005 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.

Return to Articles page