White Twp. schools agree to cut costs

Board unsure where to make reductions.
Tuesday, May 17, 2005 • By SARA LEITCH • The Express-Times

WHITE TWP. -- School board members voted Monday to cut $29,000 from the school budget, as directed by the township committee, but did not decide where those cuts would hit the $7.3 million budget.

"The board agreed with their total amount but is not bound by individual line item cuts," school board Chairman Gary Meddaugh said.

The township committee decided Thursday to cut the proposed school budget for the 2005-2006 school year after voters rejected it in April by a vote of 293-389. The proposed budget called for a tax levy of $5,394,445, $228,000 more than was budgeted for the current school year.

The amount the committee decided to cut was smaller than it could have been, chief school Administrator Anthony Amato said. He called the decision a good compromise but said the cuts will still have an effect on students next year and beyond.

"Any time you take money out of the budget it's going to have an impact on education," Amato said.

The cuts mean the school's budget is not as large as state caps allow, he said, so the total amount allowed in the next year's budget will be smaller than it would have been.

School and municipal officials agreed there wasn't much room to trim the proposed budget. The township paid municipal auditor David Evans to go over the proposed budget and suggest cuts after voters rejected it.

"His overall impression was that it was a good budget," Committeeman James Ashe said. "He said a strong argument could be made for leaving it the way it was."

Evans found room for cuts in funding for field trips, food service and at-home schooling for students who are temporarily unable to attend class. He also suggested cuts in the school's reserve fund and in medical insurance payments.

After discussion with school board members, the committee voted to recommend $29,000 in cuts. They suggested cutting $4,000 from at-home schooling, $15,000 from food service and $10,000 from the school's surplus.

The food service cuts were possible because it had a surplus of $53,000, Ashe said. The account has run a deficit in the past, he said.

"We don't want to deplete it too much, but we certainly felt there was $15,000 that could be used," Ashe said. "Even the auditor said 'I wouldn't do that every year,' but we can get away with it this year."

In addition to making the cuts, committeemen pledged financial assistance if the school found its surplus account or home education fund running low.

"We're recognizing it leaves them in a perilous situation, and we're going to make sure they're covered," Ashe said.

The committee didn't want to cut the budget but felt it had to make an effort, Ashe said. Voters who voted against the budget in 2004 were irritated when the committee seemingly ignored their wishes and approved the budget without any cuts.

"I would prefer that we didn't have to make any cuts," Ashe said. "I'm happy we found something. I'm glad we're able to do something to satisfy the voters."

Meddaugh said he understood why committeemen felt compelled to cut but said this year's budget was even leaner than the previous one.

"They tried to be fair to the voters who rejected the budget and the children of the school district who are affected by that budget," he said. "It was a difficult circumstance, and both sides tried to serve all the masters we have to serve."


Reporter Sara Leitch can be reached at 908-475-8044 or by e-mail at sleitch@express-times.com.
© 2005 The Express-Times. Used with permission.

Return to Articles page