Soaring construction costs jeopardize school program

Tuesday, November 23, 2004 • BY DUNSTAN McNICHOL • Star-Ledger Staff

Lawmakers yesterday demanded an accounting of expenses for New Jersey's expansive $8.6 billion school construction program, and proposed a committee to consider "innovative" ways to keep paying for the initiative.

Jack Spencer, chief executive officer of the Schools Construction Corp., told lawmakers that $5.7 billion of $8.6 billion initially promised by the state is already been spoken for and that by January 2006, the program will no longer have the funds to approve construction of any new schools.

Meeting the continued need, he said, will cost billions more -- including $2 billion just to cover one additional year of court-ordered construction work in 31 of the state's neediest communities.

"We have made every effort to use our resources wisely," Spencer said during his first formal report to lawmakers on the status of the program.

Spencer said construction costs of new school buildings in northern New Jersey is running at about $209 per square foot, $84 more per square foot than lawmakers had projected when they set up the school building program. In addition, he said, that figure does not include about $1 billion that has been spent for land acquisition, design and project management.

Spencer said administrative costs have amounted to 8.7 percent of the funds spent so far. But in an interview later, Spencer acknowledged that statistic understates the overhead rate for work in the 31 communities covered by the state Supreme Court's Abbott vs. Burke school financing order, where New Jersey must bankroll and manage the construction.

In these needy districts, Spencer said, New Jersey has so far approved $3.5 billion worth of schools or school repairs, including $433 million in design costs, or about 12 percent of the project totals, and most of the $479 million approved in project management fees so far.

"I think this is an issue all of us support," said Assemblyman David Wolfe (R-Ocean). "But we need to know where the money is going."

Lawmakers endorsed plans yesterday to extend funding for the program beyond the $8.6 billion already earmarked for the initiative. But they were unsuccessful in getting a firm estimate from Spencer as to how much the program might ultimately cost.

"I believe the figure to be in the billions," Spencer told the Assembly Education Committee. He said he will not have a more precise estimate until late next year, after school districts across the state have submitted five-year projections of the school building needs.

Assemblyman Joseph Malone (R-Burlington), ranking Republican on the Assembly Budget Committee, implored Spencer for an estimate in anticipation of a campaign to win voter approval for more borrowing on behalf of the school program. "People are going to have sticker shock when they get the bill," Malone said.

The Assembly panel yesterday endorsed legislation to set up a committee to review the school program's needs and to suggest alternative financing methods. In addition, Sen. Ronald Rice (D-Newark) said he is sponsoring a bill that would authorize the state to borrow another $2 billion for the program in 2006 -- enough to keep it running for one extra year, Spencer said.

So far the state has borrowed $3.4 billion for the program, which will cost about $250 million a year to repay over the next 20 years.


© 2004 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.

Return to Articles page