Panel puts sole focus on tax reform

GOP wanted spending on state constitutional convention agenda
Saturday, December 18, 2004 • BY ROBERT SCHWANEBERG • Star-Ledger Staff

With Republican lawmakers dissenting, a state task force decided yesterday that a proposed constitutional convention should stick to revising New Jersey's tax system and not try to rein in government spending.

The task force is close to finalizing its recommendations for a convention to lower property taxes. A majority of its 15 members agreed yesterday the convention would seek to change the way state and local governments raise money but have no power to address spending. It would be forbidden to tamper with constitutional guarantees of a thorough and efficient education and affordable housing opportunities.

The two Republican lawmakers on the task force insisted the convention should be free to propose limits on government spending, as did Michael Cole, a lawyer and the panel's vice chairman. But the chairman, Carl Van Horn, said there was "broad consensus" for limiting the convention's scope.

"I'm a little disappointed that I wasn't able to get unanimity, but that wasn't achievable," said Van Horn, a Rutgers University professor. The task force has a final meeting scheduled Tuesday.

The debate on the convention's powers gave a preview of what is likely to be a partisan battle in the Democrat-controlled Legislature, which created the task force and can accept or reject its proposals.

Assembly Majority Leader Joseph Roberts (D-Camden) said lowering property taxes by finding new ways to raise revenues would be "a Herculean task" in itself. Asking delegates to determine how that money should be spent "has the potential to doom the process," he warned.

But Senate Minority Leader Leonard Lance (R-Hunterdon) said many Republican lawmakers believe "the spending component is essential" and might not vote for a convention that cannot consider it.

Assemblyman Kevin O'Toole (R-Essex) said the goal of any convention "has to be to reduce the cost of government, period."

Van Horn said it is the responsibility of legislators, who answer to the voters, to determine the size of the state budget. "They do that every year," he said.

At Van Horn's suggestion, the task force agreed that delegates should be instructed not just to reduce property taxes overall but to do it in a way that protects people with modest incomes from being taxed out of their homes.

Some task force members proposed additional restrictions on delegates, such as a prohibition on tinkering with abortion rights and other individual liberties, but Van Horn said it was unnecessary. A convention that drafted restrictions on individual liberties would be so far outside its charter that its proposal "would be challenged and appropriately thrown out," he said.

The task force agreed that a panel of three retired jurists chosen by the state's chief justice should review the delegates' work to ensure they stay within their mandate. That panel's certification would be required to submit the convention proposal, in the form of a single question, to the voters for approval at the general election in 2006.

One point on which the task force agreed to disagree was the number of delegates. Half the task force members favored electing three delegates from each of the state's 40 legislative districts, for a total of 120. The others favored 90 delegates, with two elected from each district and the governor and legislative leaders appointing 10 more to ensure minorities are represented. Both options will be submitted to the Legislature.

The task force previously agreed the delegates should be chosen at next November's general election, when voters would simultaneously decide whether to call a convention. If approved, the convention would hold an organizational meeting late next year, recess while staff prepares extensive background papers and convene in the spring of 2006 at Rutgers University in New Brunswick.


Robert Schwaneberg covers legal issues. He can be reached at rschwaneberg@starledger.com or (609) 989-0324.
© 2004 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.

Return to Articles page